Monday, March 18, 2019

According To John: Signs of Jesus


John 5:2-11, 16-18 
Now in Jerusalem by the Sheep Gate there is a pool, called in Hebrew Beth-zatha, which has five porticoes. In these lay many invalids—blind, lame, and paralyzed. One man was there who had been ill for thirty-eight years. When Jesus saw him lying there and knew that he had been there a long time, he said to him, “Do you want to be made well?” The sick man answered him, “Sir, I have no one to put me into the pool when the water is stirred up; and while I am making my way, someone else steps down ahead of me.” Jesus said to him, “Stand up, take your mat and walk.” At once the man was made well, and he took up his mat and began to walk.

Now that day was a sabbath. So the Jews said to the man who had been cured, “It is the sabbath; it is not lawful for you to carry your mat.” But he answered them, “The man who made me well said to me, ‘Take up your mat and walk.’”

Therefore the Jews started persecuting Jesus, because he was doing such things on the sabbath. But Jesus answered them, “My Father is still working, and I also am working.” For this reason the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because he was not only breaking the sabbath, but was also calling God his own Father, thereby making himself equal to God.



Can you imagine a President of the United States that did not believe that Jesus was God?

A President who didn’t believe that the miracles of Jesus were authentic but rather were myths?

A President devoted to the teaching of Jesus — but not always agreeing with how Jesus was interpreted by the biblical sources?
         
Can you imagine a President who saw the four gospels as "untrustworthy correspondents?"

Thomas Jefferson struggled with the Biblical account of Jesus --- so he created his own gospel by taking a sharp instrument, perhaps a penknife, to copies of the New Testament and pieced together his own account of Christ’s philosophy.

Much of the material Jefferson elected to not include related to miraculous events, he rejected anything that he perceived as “contrary to reason.”
          Including the resurrection stories

Thomas Jefferson did what many of us want to do at times —- excise from our minds things that don’t make sense or cannot be proven.

Last week, I had the privilege of teaching the re-confirm class. 

It is a class for adults who want to go over the same material that the youth are learning in confirmation.

It was my first chance to teach the class and I found it fascinating.

What I realized is that:
·         They have the same questions that the youth have — they just have better tools to articulate those questions
·         They are not always sure what to do with the things that don’t make sense

But what fascinated me the most was an explanation given why our youth struggle so much with accepting what they read in the Bible

What was shared was that students today are taught in school that they must prove things.
          Papers are written with the need to PROVE a position
                   How does one PROVE what is written in the Bible?

Even John understood this in his conclusion to his Gospel in Jesus’ encounter with Thomas — when he said (20:29)
“Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have come to believe.”

It is understandable how Jefferson could then conclude that we should remove all those un-provable stories from the Bible —
but then again — maybe he was missing the point

John has only seven miracle stories in the Gospel while the Synoptic Gospel's have over 30 different ones

John not only excludes many of the miracles in the synoptic Gospels, but he sees them as having a very different purpose
          In the synoptics they are there to win people to Jesus
                   That is not John’s purpose

John does not even call them miracles
          He sees them as SIGNS

Let me elaborate a little
          In John there are 7 Signs — in biblical times numerology was very important
                   7 = wholeness or completeness

          In John there are 7 "I Am" sayings
                   I don’t think it is a coincidence

Bart Ehrman says:
Jesus does not do as many miracles in John as he does in the Synoptics, but the ones he does are, for the most part, far more spectacular. Indeed, unlike in the Synoptics, Jesus does nothing to hide his abilities; he performs miracles openly in order to demonstrate who he is. 

Jesus performs miracles openly in order to demonstrate who he is

What do these signs say about who Jesus is?
          For John —- there is always more than what is visible to the eye

I find the first sign in John’s Gospel fascinating — It is the story of Jesus and his mother attending a wedding together in the small community of Cana

It is the elements of the Cana story that are so intriguing.

Jesus and his disciples, who have been down in the Jordan valley with John the Baptist, return to the Galilee to join a wedding celebration.

Jesus’ mother Mary and his brothers are already there (2:12), so it seems to be some kind of “family affair.”

Indeed, Mary seems to be at some level officially involved in the celebration as a kind of co-hostess since she takes charge of things when the wine planned for the occasion, unexpectedly runs out, indicating either that the crowd was larger than expected or that things became quite festive, or both.

Mary turns to Jesus and tells him take care of the problem

Jesus finds nearby six stone jars (not the typical clay jars) that could hold 20 or 30 gallons of water and he told the servants to fill the jars to the brim.

After filling the jars, he instructs them to draw off some of the water and take it to the headwaiter

John 2:9-10 (The Message)
When the host tasted the water that had become wine (he didn’t know what had just happened but the servants, of course, knew), he called out to the bridegroom, “Everybody I know begins with their finest wines and after the guests have had their fill brings in the cheap stuff. But you’ve saved the best till now!”

In some ways this is one of the strangest stories in the Bible surrounding Jesus.

We all know the point of the story isn’t that Jesus is the life of the party and if you run out of wine Jesus will bring the good stuff
          But what is John trying to tell us?

What is hidden beneath the surface that a literal reading won't tell us?

I believe there are a couple of key concepts here

·         John seems to imply that if we do as Jesus tells us to do — then our ordinary lives can become extraordinary

·         Jesus took stone jars, not clay ones, because stone jars were used for ritual cleansing.  Jesus seems to be saying that he will cleanse us of the impurities in our life if we will follow.   Or as Hamilton put it: “life in Christ is richer and more joyful than the ritualistic religion of first century Judaism.”

·         This full extraordinary life is available right now — not just in the future

What is amazing, is these same concepts are found in the second “Sign” story that I want to look at

This is one of my favorite of the "Sign" stories in John

Jesus has made his way back to Jerusalem for his 2nd (of three visits)
          This is one of the big differences between John and the Synoptic Gospels
In the Synoptic Gospels Jesus only goes to Jerusalem once (at the end of his ministry)
                             In John, Jesus travels to Jerusalem three times

Jesus is near the sheep gate — near the modern Lion’s Gate (or St. Stephen’s gate)

It is the Sabbath — and that will become an important detail

The location of this sign is the Pools of Bethesda the remains of which are still visible today

It was believed that this was a place where one could experience healing — thus people would gather in the hope that they might be the next one healed.

The Pools of Bethesda are described as having five porticoes — a puzzling feature suggesting an unusual five-sided pool, which most scholars dismissed as an unhistorical literary creation.
Yet when this site was excavated, it revealed a rectangular pool with two basins separated by a wall—thus a five-sided pool—and each side had a portico.

This story about Jesus’ miracle suggests a long history of healing at the site.

Roman medicinal baths constructed at the Bethesda Pool only a century or two later reflect this continued tradition.
When Christians controlled Jerusalem in the Byzantine and Crusader periods, they liked to mark the sites of Jesus’ miracles and other important events in his life, so they added a chapel and churches that now cover the Bethesda Pool complex.

The way the story is told it was understood that the first person to enter the pool when the waters were stirred up would supposedly be cured of his or her ailment

We are told that there was a man who had been ill for 38 years who had been coming to the pools for a long time hoping to be cured.

Jesus sees him and asks him a profound question: “Do you want to get well?”

The truth of the matter is, many of us don’t want to be made well
          We like our addictions, our illnesses, our whatever it is that ails us

But this man wants to be cured — he says to Jesus
“Sir, when the water is stirred, I don’t have anybody to put me in the pool. By the time I get there, somebody else is already in.”  John 5:7 (MSG)

The very next thing we see is Jesus — seemingly ignoring the superstition surrounding the water AND the man’s complaint as to why he’s still there after 38 years — telling the man to get up, pick up his mat and walk --- Notice, Jesus does not put him in the waters.

What’s lost in the translation from Greek is that Jesus’ words to the man carry the implication of an order — almost like that of a commanding General to a private.

Immediately the guy was on his feet — mat in hand — heading toward the Temple

It is at this point that we can begin to see the deeper meaning John has been leading us toward.

"DO YOU WANT TO GET WELL?”

With this question, Jesus meant to get both this ailing man’s attention and ours — to help us see a truth which is too often overlooked.

Jesus knew that healing and moving forward in transformation was going to require the paralytic man to move into territory he’d never known.

His circumstances were sad and unfortunate, and undoubtedly he’d wished, wanted, and even prayed to be able to walk thousands of times over the last 38 years.

But Jesus knew that not everything about being healed would be easy.

There would be some results of his healing that would be a challenge.

For instance, he was immediately going to be accused of being a sinner by the religious leaders.
          Why? Because he was breaking the law by carrying his mat on the Sabbath

Yet, when we read the story carefully, it appears that Jesus very intentionally picked a Sabbath to heal the man

We Jesus trying to make a point to the religious leaders?
          Was he trying to push their buttons?
                   It really seems so

Jesus is seems is trying to open the eyes of those who get wrapped up in the law and fail to see God's grace because of it.
          Sometimes we cannot see what it right in front of us.

Hamilton reminds us of this with a story about Vincent Van Gogh's masterpiece painting: Starry Night

The painting shows a town and a church at night --- I am sure you are familiar with it.

Above this beautiful scene is the most amazing sky: the moon and the stars whirl like pinwheels above the town.

Many see the lights in the sky representing Jesus --- the light of the world --- or maybe just the light of God's love (Van Gogh was a very religious man)

Most of the houses in the village have this light in them as well --- perhaps signifying the light of the Christ in the hearts and lives of the people.

But what is striking is that the church ---
the church which is at the center of the painting ---
the church has no light.

Many believe this is Van Gogh pointing out that the church of his day often seemed to lack the love of God --- so he painted it as a cold building without the light of Christ in it.

He suggests that the church is more concerned about following the letter of the law --- than being a conduit for the light and life of Jesus.

John seems to be asking us --- is the light of Christ shining through our lives, or are we so captivated by following the rules --- that the light and life of God is diminished.

And from that moment on, John tells us, the religious folk redoubled their efforts to get rid of this troublemaker

To get rid of the one who to them seemed to lessen God because he failed to follow all the rules.

And not just get rid of him --- to put him to death.
Because they could not hear the question Jesus was asking them: Do You Want To Be Healed?

Pick up your mat, Jesus says --- and be made well.

Sunday, March 03, 2019

Grace Upon Grace


Gracious God, I kneel before you a sinner.
I know that I am not worthy to be called a child of yours.
Yet despite my sin, despite my continuing to sin and fall short of your glory --- forty years ago --- you called me into ministry.

Loving God, these past few weeks have been hard --- as we have wrestled over who is worthy to be a pastor in YOUR church.  And as I have studied the bible, I have become even more conflicted. 

Clearly in the few texts that spell out requirements of ministry I fall short. 
I have failed to live up to the ideal that the authors suggested.

And yet O Lord, I have been called by you, vetted and ordained by your church.

I thank you for accepting me --- for I kneel before your throne only by your grace.

Grace that is sufficient for me --- grace that is sufficient for all.

As we wrestle today --- put in our minds eyes other servants who have been called by you --- yet clearly by the ideal requirements stated in the bible are unqualified
·         every pastor who has been divorced or married a divorced person
·         every pastor whose children have not remained in the faith or have rebelled
·         every pastor who has not demonstrated self control at all times
·         every pastor who is a woman

Gracious God we have all fallen short of your ideal --- I have fallen FAR short of your ideal --- for my sins are legion --- and yet you have still called me and invited me to pastor your flock.

Thank you for your grace that enables me to stand before you and your people.  This I pray in Jesus name.  Amen.



Almost 20 years ago, the United Methodist Church adopted a new slogan
          Open Hearts, Open Minds, Open Doors

For many of us, we saw in this slogan a glimmer of hope that the church that we loved would truly open the doors to the many marginalized in our society.

The church that I was serving at the time was going through a long range planning session and as a result adopted a new vision statement stating that they saw their mission as "offering hope, unconditional love and meaning for life."

A couple of years ago, Discipleship Ministries of the UMC continued along this same vein when they encouraged each Methodist to "See All The People".

If you have been paying attention to the media these last few days --- from all the major outlets, to NPR and the religious news services --- the overwhelming majority suggest that --- with the action that we took in St. Louis this past week --- we closed the door to a majority of people, and are shutting our eyes and our hearts toward them.

There have been lots of emotions this past week
·         Some of you feel defeated
          "Kicked in the gut" was how someone described it to me
          "Asked to leave home" was another

·         Some of you feel as if God has been defended
          Satisfied to know that we didn't "give in" to culture
          Happy that the Bible was protected and held in high esteem

More than anything I just felt sad
          Sad that we made our church more and more exclusive and unwelcoming

And before you get angry with me --- I believe both points of view are real and authentic

Obviously I don't agree with the decision that was adopted in St. Louis

So what happened?

In 1972, the General Conference added to our social principles the sentence that we have wrestled with ever since.
"we insist that all persons are entitled to have their human and civil rights ensured, though we do not condone the practice of homosexuality and consider this practice incompatible with Christian teachings."

And I will be honest, if I had been asked my opinion on it in 1972, I probably would have agreed. 
          But I don't today.

My relationship with Jesus has moved from an idolatry of the Bible (thinking it was God) to hearing the voice of Jesus

Every 4 years since 1972, those words have been debated, argued over as we have sought to understand how we relate to a changing world.

In 2016, the General Conference decided to create a Commission on The Way Forward as it relates to this issue.

They were to study the issue and bring a proposal to the Council of Bishops and to a specially called General Conference, the one that just wrapped up in St Louis last Tuesday.

The Commission initially presented two plans, The One Church Plan and the Connectional Plan, and, after 2 1/2 years of study at the last minute the "Traditional Plan" was thrown in the mix.

The Council of Bishops received the plans and by an overwhelming majority recommended the One Church Plan which allowed each Jurisdiction, Conference and local Church to wrestle with the issues of sexuality in their individual context.

The plans, along with many petitions went before the elected delegates of the General Conference last week.

After much debate, the General Conference adopted issues around pensions for churches or pastors that wish to leave the denomination, an exit plan for churches to leave and a modified traditional plan.

To be honest with you, I do not know the exact language of what passed.  I am sure it is available somewhere, but I have yet to find it.

Regardless, what I can tell you is that the conference was hurtful to the body of Christ.  I witnessed that in statements made by persons on both sides of the issue.

We will not easily mend the hurt that happened.

Rev Tom Berlin from the Virginia Annual Conference said this about the Traditional plan
"it will be a virus that will make the American church very sick  Many pastors are going to leave, many annual conference will leave. … There will be trials, and they will be on the news. The only news about the church will be about people we don’t serve.”

In my mind, the saddest part is that many portions of the traditional plan will be ruled unconstitutional, as will the exit plan.
          In other words, we will be right back to where we started (or will we?)

Many believe that the traditional plan was put forth to scare the rest of the UMC and allow particularly our Southern Methodist Churches to leave with their property.

I would not be surprised if that isn't still the result.

But at what cost?
          And I am not talking about money

          At what cost to our mission of sharing God's unconditional love?

          At what cost to making --- not believers in Jesus --- but Disciples of Jesus?

70% of those under 50 support gay marriage
68% of those in mainline denominations do as well

What are they going to say to this harsh and mean spirited decision that has come out of St Louis?
          Well if my text messages, email and FaceBook are any indication, many will leave

We have been through this before ---

In 1939, the UMC was trying to figure out what to do with black people
At that GC, the segregationalist and racist Central Jurisdiction was voted into being. The late Bishop Thomas wrote that the white folks stood up and clapped, and the black folks sat down and cried.

From what I am witnessing we are at another stand up and clap, sit down and cry moment.

And the question becomes --- where do you find yourself?

Since last fall, Matt and I have been wrestling with this issue --- whether at information sessions, Bible Studies, various committees within the church or with you individually

We have tried to educate and share why we believe what we believe: that the One Church Plan made the most sense for the UMC and for Meridian Street in particular.

Through this process, Jesus has moved me, and given me a better understanding -- not only of scripture --- but more importantly, of my relationship to Jesus and others.

I will not be the same after this

I DO NOT BELIEVE that committed homosexual relationships are a sin --- any more than committed heterosexual ones are.

I do not believe that wearing more than one type of clothing is a sin.

Nor do I believe it is a sin to eat shellfish or pork

I do not believe a person who remarries and has been divorced is committing a sin

I do not believe that God's grace is limited to the people I accept, or who believe like I do

I do not believe that believing in the right things is enough --- we are to be actively engaged in following Jesus, seeking to transform the world with his unconditional love.  And that we are called to especially care for those who are marginalized in our society.

My intention this morning was to make the case why I believed the One Church Plan was the most grace filled.

I planned on doing that with the text that was read this morning. 
          The idea that God will separate the wheat from the chaff -- that it is not our job

And I fully believe that.
          Our job is not to be the gatekeepers for Jesus
                   Jesus opens the gate wide to all and Jesus can decide
          Our job is to welcome all into Jesus

I have been a Methodist my whole life. 
          I remember in 1968 when we merged and became United Methodists

I have served in ministry since my sophomore year in college, when I helped start a campus ministry --- which means I have been engaged in ministry for 40 years

The churches I have served have been committed to the United Methodist way -- promoting connection and that God's grace is available to all

Under the rules that just passed at General Conference; I doubt I would be approved for ordained ministry today. 
          I doubt most of the people I know who are clergy could get accepted either

While I find much of the legislation repugnant --- especially that which calls the “practice of homosexuality is incompatible with Christian teaching.”

What bothers me more is that it went on to imply that same sex married couples who wish to be reconciled with the church need to divorce and break up their families (which often include children).

The legislation further added mandatory penalties for any pastor who performs a same sex wedding or even hosts one.
          Such a pastor would be suspended for 1 year without pay for a first offence
          And automatically defrocked for a second.

Bishops would also be under penalty if they disobeyed the Discipline.

Approximately two thirds of US delegates voted against the Traditional Plan

It was approved by a coalition of our global United Methodist brothers, and sisters

Adam Hamilton, pastor of the largest UMC in the United States wrote:
My hope is that the leadership of the WCA (Wesley Covenant Society) is re-evaluating what’s happened, and the legislation their coalition just passed.  They appear to have the votes to pass whatever they would like.  It is hard for many of us to see any future in a scenario in which the WCA and their supporters control the church and show disregard for the rest of the church.   US churches that disagree with this path backwards will not sit by quietly and watch as this takes effect.  They will protest, live in disobedience to the Discipline or leave, and the impact will be far greater than the leadership of the WCA ever imagined.   If the WCA leadership does nothing, I believe they will have won the battle and lost the church.   

My mentor in seminary was the former Dean of the Duke Divinity School Thomas Langford.  I served on staff at the church that Tom and his family attended, and he was not only a professor, but also my friend.

I remember while in seminary, Tom shared with a class an early draft of a book that he was working on --- I don't believe it was ever published --- but it was entitled GRACE UPON GRACE

It was his premise that God's grace is sufficient
          That God is big enough to defend God's self and it was our job to invite people in

One of the things that has always struck me is the notion that God's love is somewhat limited.  If God loves you --- there might not be enough for me.

But there is grace upon grace --- sufficient for all of creation --- our job is to humble accept it and to invite others to experience it.

In just a few moments, you are going to be invited to God's table.
          NO ONE HERE MERITS BEING INVITED

But just the same, God invites you.

But as long as I am pastor at Meridian Street UMC, this table will be open to ALL.
          Straight, gay,
          Married, single, or divorced
          Black, brown or white
          Citizen or alien
          Rich or poor
          Sinner or Saint

This table will always be open

And I will do everything that I can to open the doors of the church to all of God's children.

I will support those who believe they are called by God to ministry but also were created by God gay

I have never performed a same sex wedding --- it has always been my biggest fear.
I was afraid I would have to choose between what I knew was right --- and angering some of the members in the church I was serving at the time.

In the future ---I will do what God calls me to do

To all of our gay members here at Meridian Street Church --- I LOVE YOU, GOD LOVES YOU

And to all who are broken hearted over this decision --- let us make this our rallying cry
Don't leave; let us keep working for change.

God's table is big enough --- even if we disagree
No one --- regardless of which side of this issue you are on --- is being excluded from God's table

Someone shared a powerful story the other day and I hope that they are not offended if I share it

They talked about being on a youth retreat when the leader of the retreat, as they were sitting in a circle, turned to the person that they really disliked and said to them "I love you most of all (and then gave a reason).

As you can imagine, this young person was upset that their leader had made this affirmation to the one that they struggled with, because they thought they were loved most of all.  And for a time they sat their stewing in their indignation

But soon, the leader turned to them and said: "I Love You most of all . . ."

As we prepare to come to the table, I encourage you to think of the biggest sinner you know. 
          Can you see them?
          Put them in your minds eye
          If you can't see anyone, then just think of me

And listen as God says to them: "I Love You most of all . . ."

And unless you can hear them say that to the one you really struggle with --- I doubt you can really understand or appreciate it when God says to you: "I Love You most of all . . ."

Let us care for one another, and come together to God's table.  Amen.